Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Alternative Sites & Focused Changes (Reg. 18)
Search representations
Results for Norfolk County Council - Historic Environment search
New searchComment
Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Alternative Sites & Focused Changes (Reg. 18)
QUESTION 2a: Do you agree with the allocation of SN0433, Land south of Wheel Road, Alpingtonfor at least 12 dwellings on an area of 1.0ha? Please explain your response.
Representation ID: 3392
Received: 24/01/2024
Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Historic Environment
Amber - archaeological mitigation will probably be necessary but is unlikely to prevent development.
See attachment for full representation.
Comment
Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Alternative Sites & Focused Changes (Reg. 18)
QUESTION 3a: Do you agree with the allocation of SN6000, Land north of Chapel Street, Barford? Please explain your response.
Representation ID: 3393
Received: 24/01/2024
Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Historic Environment
Amber - archaeological mitigation will probably be necessary but is unlikely to prevent development.
See attachment for full representation.
Comment
Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Alternative Sites & Focused Changes (Reg. 18)
QUESTION 4a: Do you agree with the allocation of SN0552REVC, Land north of Watton Road, Barford, as an extension to VC BAR1, for up to 20 additional dwellings on an area of 0.73ha? Please explain your response.
Representation ID: 3394
Received: 24/01/2024
Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Historic Environment
Amber - archaeological mitigation will probably be necessary but is unlikely to prevent development.
See attachment for full representation.
Comment
Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Alternative Sites & Focused Changes (Reg. 18)
QUESTION 5a: Do you agree with the allocation of SN0055, Land east of Spur Road and south of Norwich Road, Barnham Broom, for approximately 15 dwellings on an area of 1.0ha? Please explain your response.
Representation ID: 3395
Received: 24/01/2024
Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Historic Environment
Amber - archaeological mitigation will probably be necessary but is unlikely to prevent development. Site of a WW2 compound.
See attachment for full representation.
Comment
Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Alternative Sites & Focused Changes (Reg. 18)
QUESTION 6: Do you agree with the boundary of revised allocation VC BAW1 REV, Land to the east of Stocks Hill, Bawburgh, to facilitate a reduced density of up to 35 dwellings on an area of 1.9ha? Please explain your response.
Representation ID: 3396
Received: 24/01/2024
Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Historic Environment
Amber - archaeological mitigation will probably be necessary but is unlikely to prevent development.
See attachment for full representation.
Comment
Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Alternative Sites & Focused Changes (Reg. 18)
QUESTION 8a: Do you agree with the proposed allocation of SN4020, Land west of Old Yarmouth Road, Broome forat least 12 dwellings on an area of 0.76ha? Please explain your response.
Representation ID: 3397
Received: 24/01/2024
Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Historic Environment
Amber - archaeological mitigation will probably be necessary but is unlikely to prevent development.
See attachment for full representation.
Comment
Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Alternative Sites & Focused Changes (Reg. 18)
QUESTION 7a: Do you agree with the proposed allocation of VC DIT1 REV, Land at Thwaite Road and Tunney's Lane, Ditchingham, for up to 45 dwellings on an area of on an area of 2.42ha? Please explain your response.
Representation ID: 3398
Received: 24/01/2024
Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Historic Environment
Amber - archaeological mitigation will probably be necessary but is unlikely to prevent development.
See attachment for full representation.
Comment
Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Alternative Sites & Focused Changes (Reg. 18)
QUESTION 9a: Do you agree with the allocation of SN0218REV, Land north of The Street, Earshamfor up to 25 dwellings on an area of 1.4ha? Please explain your response.
Representation ID: 3399
Received: 24/01/2024
Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Historic Environment
Amber - archaeological mitigation will probably be necessary but is unlikely to prevent development. Cropmark of significant prehistoric remains.
See attachment for full representation.
Comment
Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Alternative Sites & Focused Changes (Reg. 18)
QUESTION 10a: Do you agree with the proposed allocation VC GIL1 REV, South of Geldeston Road and Daisy Way, Gillingham, on 2.92ha, for approximately 40 dwellings. Please explain your response.
Representation ID: 3400
Received: 24/01/2024
Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Historic Environment
Amber - archaeological mitigation will probably be necessary but is unlikely to prevent development. There has already been a planning application on this site.
See attachment for full representation.
Comment
Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Alternative Sites & Focused Changes (Reg. 18)
QUESTION 11a: Do you agree with the proposed increase in density on allocation VC SWA2, Land on Main Road, Swardeston, to accommodate approximately 40 dwellings? Please explain your response.
Representation ID: 3401
Received: 24/01/2024
Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Historic Environment
Amber - archaeological mitigation will probably be necessary but is unlikely to prevent development. There is already a planning application on this site.
See attachment for full representation.