Broadland & South Norfolk Custom and Self-Build Housing SPD

Search representations

Results for Wheatman Planning Limited search

New search New search

Comment

Broadland & South Norfolk Custom and Self-Build Housing SPD

5. Self and Custom Build Housing Registers

Representation ID: 4280

Received: 21/03/2025

Respondent: Wheatman Planning Limited

Representation Summary:

Para 5.9 is not consistent with Para 8.25, with the latter correctly identifying the use of conditions on an outline planning permission where the eligibility of the end occupier is unknown at that stage.

Full text:

The advice in para 5.9 is not consistent with that in para 8.25 in respect of applications for outline consents and the eligibility criteria. Para 8.25 correctly states that where an application for outline planning permission is made, conditions in respect of eligibility will be applied to the permission, and the eligibility test in respect of the criteria used for Part 1 of the Register must be met at reserved matters stage.

This could avoid potential situations where outline applications submitted by landowners or promoters of a scheme are refused purely on this issue.

The wording of para 5.9 should be amended along the lines of "If an application is initially submitted in outline and the end occupier is not known then conditions will be applied to the grant of outline permission and detailed information about the end occupier will need to be presented at the reserved matters stage so that eligibility for Part 1 of the register can be checked."

Comment

Broadland & South Norfolk Custom and Self-Build Housing SPD

Exceptions sites in the countryside through GNLP Policy 7.5

Representation ID: 4281

Received: 21/03/2025

Respondent: Wheatman Planning Limited

Representation Summary:

Examples of the stipulations used in s106 agreements or conditions should be provided to inform at an early stage the potential occupants of a custom/self build property, and professionals alike.

Full text:

The use of conditions and s106 agreements is understandable, and within the context of the comments of appeal Inspectors, wholly appropriate to meet the objectives of the GNLP Policy 7.5. However, as the SPD is intended to “expand upon policy and provide further detail to support the implementation of policies in the local plan” (para 1.1) it is considered that examples of the stipulations should be provided in an appendix, with an overview provided within the body text of the DPD. This would be particularly helpful to custom/self builders researching the situation, without recourse to the LPA.

As mentioned in our comments in relation to para 5.9, the wording of the condition should apply to the end occupant, not the applicant. The use of conditions and S106 agreements ensure the end occupant of a property will meet the occupancy criteria for a custom or self-build home. This is particularly necessary in the case of applications for outline planning permission, where the applicant may not be the end occupant(s), and/or where more than one plot may be proposed.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.