Comment

Representation ID: 1137

Received: 01/08/2021

Respondent: Mr John Heaser

There would be some logic in using part of SN0488 to continue the line of existing houses with sympathetic development. However the site suffers even worse noise and air pollution than SN4052. Both sites suffer the same problems with drainage and road junction.
SN2044 is at least outside the Landscape Protection zone and development there would not set such a dangerous precedent for further development. However an estate of 25 houses would be overdevelopment and out of character with the neighbouring buildings. Development of SN2044 should require provision of a cycle path to connect to the Hethersett Lane path.