Comment
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
Representation ID: 1161
Received: 01/08/2021
Respondent: Mr Magnus Magnusson
Representation Summary:
My client considers that their ‘rejected’ site (SN2031) should be allocated (and/or included within the settlement boundary) instead of, or at the very least, in addition to, currently ‘preferred’ site allocation SN1057. Indeed, it is their view that site SN2031 is inherently more suitable (sustainable) than site SN1057 for the reasons outlined within the Supporting Statement and associated documents that accompany this submission.