Comment
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
Representation ID: 1314
Received: 01/08/2021
Respondent: Ms Alison Rhodes
Representation Summary:
Three rejected sites could be reviewed:
Two at Kirstead Green (SN2174 and SN4004). The arguments for rejection (apart from the issue of surface water) do not seem strong. Modest development here would fit the concept of sustainability whilst being reasonably near facilities and services.
The site southeast of Mereside (SN0490). Of the arguments for rejection, 'visibility' from Hungate Lane (not a busy road) and a PRoW are not strong although the situation and access require consideration.
Inclusion of the above would alleviate pressure on the shortlisted sites whilst still potentially achieving the proposed number of houses..