Comment
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
Representation ID: 228
Received: 29/06/2021
Respondent: Mr Magnus Magnusson
Representation Summary:
My client considers that their ‘rejected’ site (SN3006) should be allocated instead of, or at the very least, in addition to, currently preferred site SN0319. Indeed, it is their view that their site (options A or B) is inherently more suitable (sustainable) than site SN0319 for the reasons outlined within the Supporting Statement that accompanies this submission.