Object
Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan - Alternative Sites & Focused Changes (Reg. 18)
Representation ID: 3282
Received: 21/12/2023
Respondent: Mrs Julie Tudor
Outrageous to use the word “density” as an excuse to increase this size of this parcel of land. Why’s that? To make the landowner even richer? The whole thing smells of corruption with the landowner and developer telling everyone “it’s a done deal” Is it? This village will fight right to central government to see that justice is done. Micheal Gove and the PM have already laid out their plans. NO green fields, NO farmland and NO to changing the look and feel of ANY village. You will have achieved ALL of these if you pursue this site. Shameful!
I thoroughly object to the increase in hectares for this site. You have abused the work “density” as raised by the residents who were prepared to work with you to create a small development of bungalows as we have seen created opposite this site and yet you have chosen to deal with the density question by increasing the size of the land. What an absolute outrage!! How dare you?! This site is a green field, farm land, next to a conservation area in a tiny village with no shops or public transport. What are you trying to do here, break every rule in the book!