I think the individuals that have already objected (highlighting roads, traffic, flooding, school, loss of habitat, lack of services, destruction of village life, urban sprawl, impact on existing residents etc etc), coupled with George Freemans objections, highlight why this is an extremely bad idea (it was a bad idea at 30 let alone an increased number). The village can meet any requirement by sensible single dwelling infill or very small development’s, as has happened previously on the High Street.. This is the countryside and it should be protected not destroyed for no other reason than profit, this has nothing to do with providing homes.