QUESTION 47: Do you support
Support
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
Representation ID: 1519
Received: 02/08/2021
Respondent: Savills
Our clients, The Landowners support the proposed allocation SN0373. The assessment requires clarification of the access, and we would confirm that adequate rights of way have been retained through DIT 1 to Rider Haggard Way. We have provided a letter from Badger Building who are the Landowners of DIT 1 demonstrating the delivery of that site and that access over DIT 1 is both available and achievable. I can confirm that our clients, the Landowners of SN0373 are committed to bringing the site forward as quickly as possible and within a 5 year timescale.
Comment
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
Representation ID: 1939
Received: 02/08/2021
Respondent: Water Management Alliance
See attachment for full response.
SN0373 – Land between Thwaite Road and Tunneys Lane
Site is immediately adjacent to the Waveney, Lower Yare and Lothingland IDD.
Major development - If surface water discharges within the watershed catchment of the Board's IDD, we request that this discharge is facilitated in line with the Non-statutory technical standards for sustainable drainage systems (SuDS).
Comment
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
Representation ID: 2012
Received: 02/08/2021
Respondent: Environment Agency (Eastern Region)
Foul Water Flows
For sites SN2011SL, SN0373 and SN0345, available information indicates fewer than 100 houses in these developments. Ditchingham WRC has capacity for this. If the house allocation is substantially increased, (we see there is additional planned development already nearby), then capcity at the WRC will be limited. However, current information provided indicates there is treatment capacity at present.
Comment
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
Representation ID: 2085
Received: 14/07/2021
Respondent: Norfolk County Council - LLFA
See attachments for full response.
We were unable to review this site as a cross-reference with the provided GIS information was not possible. We have highlighted this row as pink in our review table.
Comment
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
Representation ID: 2179
Received: 14/07/2021
Respondent: Norfolk County Council - LLFA
Please see attachments for full response.
Few or no constraints. Standard information required at a planning stage.
1.] At risk of surface water flooding?: Yes * 3.33% AEP Event [Extent]: Minor flooding * 3.33% AEP Event [Depth]: 0.00 - 0.60cm. * 1.0% AEP Event [Extent]: Minor flooding * 1.0% AEP Event [Depth]: 0.00 - 0.60cm. * 0.1% AEP Event [Extent]: Minor flooding|Moderate flooding * 0.1% AEP Event [Depth]: 0.00 - 0.60cm. 2.] Internal & external flooding?: * On-site: No * Within proximity to site (~500.00m): Yes - External Flooding 3.] Watercourses [Online ordinary watercourses or mains rivers]?: * On-site: No * Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No 4.] Surface water sewer systems?: * On-site: Yes * Within proximity to site (~100.00m): Yes 5.] Source Protection Zone?: Source Protection Zone 3 6.] Internal Drainage Board?: No IDB referenced 7.] The site predominantly has superficial deposits of SAND AND GRAVEL. Comments on infiltration potential are dependent on a complete geotechnical investigation, including BRE365 Soakaway Testing. Where possible, surface water infiltration should be utilised.
The on-site flood risk forms the start of a minor/moderate flow path in the 0.1% AEP event, contributing to a major flow path adjacent to the site in the 0.1% AEP event. Flood risk is concentrated to the centre/west of the site with water flowing north off of the site. We advise this must be considered in the site assessment.There is opportunity to mitigate the flood risk leading off of the site.A large area of the site is unaffected by flood risk and has potential to be developed.
Assessment: Green
Comment
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
Representation ID: 2238
Received: 28/09/2021
Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Senior Ecologist
Rating: Green no major ecological constraints identified from desk-top search. Surveys, and biodiversity enhancement in accordance with policy required.
Site comprises an agricultural field, bounded to the south by housing. Site within SSSI IRZ but residential development does not trigger consultation with Natural England. Site near Broom Heath Pits SSSI, LNR and county wildlife site, and candidate county geodiversity site, which is managed by Norfolk Wildlife Trust (who should be consulted on any application). Site in strategic GI corridor and green habitat zone for great crested newts. Applications for planning consent should be accompanied by a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal/Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) which, together with the mitigation hierarchy should inform the design. Consideration should be given to delivering Biodiversity Net Gain.
Object
South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 18 Draft)
Representation ID: 2264
Received: 01/07/2021
Respondent: Lanpro Services Ltd
We object SN0373, Land between Thwaite Road and Tunneys Lane being allocated as it would put the delivery of housing in the area in the control of one party who may land bank or build at their own market absorption rates. The site is not as well located to the village centre as SN0078 and would result in substantial harm to landscape quality/character. If it is allocated the site should be as a reserve subject to the delivery of the DIT1 allocation within the next 2 years, failure to fully deliver that site should result in the removal of that
allocation.