QUESTION 48: Do you support

Support

Representation ID: 31

Received: 07/06/2021

Respondent: Ms Liz Shepherd

It will set a lovely president for sustainable residential builds for locals, by locals. It is to be in keeping with the area and for animal welfare. It is low impact housing and shows that local councils are listening to the needs of locals. It rejects big builds which add strain on flood plains, ecology and other resources. More low impact housing should be considered in keeping with rural needs.

Support

Representation ID: 55

Received: 09/06/2021

Respondent: Miss Bridget Keeble

A single dwelling with land would be my preferred option too.

Object

Representation ID: 478

Received: 20/07/2021

Respondent: Lanpro Services Ltd

We object to the allocation of this site. It’s not being promoted for the allocation being offered and there is no evidence that it would deliver the housing suggested.
The site would impact negatively on both landscape and amenity and we also consider that the access road is not suitable for the increased traffic levels that would be experienced from this site if developed to its full potential.

Support

Representation ID: 1497

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Miss Bridget Keeble

I support the applicant who is planning to build a single, eco-friendly, dwelling.

Comment

Representation ID: 1940

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Water Management Alliance

See attachment for full response.
SN2011SL – Land off Lamberts Way, Ditchingham
Site is immediately adjacent to the Waveney, Lower Yare and Lothingland IDD.
Minor development – no further comments.

Comment

Representation ID: 2013

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Environment Agency (Eastern Region)

Foul Water Flows
For sites SN2011SL, SN0373 and SN0345, available information indicates fewer than 100 houses in these developments. Ditchingham WRC has capacity for this. If the house allocation is substantially increased, (we see there is additional planned development already nearby), then capcity at the WRC will be limited. However, current information provided indicates there is treatment capacity at present.

Comment

Representation ID: 2152

Received: 14/07/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - LLFA

SN2011SL
Few or no constraints.
Standard information required at a planning stage. "1.] At risk of surface water flooding?: No
* 3.33% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 3.33% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 1.0% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 1.0% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 0.1% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 0.1% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
2.] Internal & external flooding?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~500.00m): Yes - Internal Flooding|Yes - External Flooding
3.] Watercourses [Online ordinary watercourses or mains rivers]?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
4.] Surface water sewer systems?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
5.] Source Protection Zone?: Source Protection Zone 3
6.] Internal Drainage Board?: No IDB referenced
7.] The site predominantly has superficial deposits of SAND AND GRAVEL. Comments on infiltration potential are dependent on a complete geotechnical investigation, including BRE365 Soakaway Testing. Where possible, surface water infiltration should be utilised."

See attachment for full comments
Assessment: Green

Comment

Representation ID: 2240

Received: 28/09/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Senior Ecologist

Rating: Green no major ecological constraints identified from desk-top search. Surveys, and biodiversity enhancement in accordance with policy required.
Land adjacent to priority habitat (deciduous woodland) (see MAGIC). Site in amber habitat zone for great crested newts and strategic green infrastructure corridor. Site within SSSI IRZ but residential development does not trigger consultation with Natural England. Applications for planning consent should be accompanied by a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal/Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) which, together with the mitigation hierarchy should inform the design. Consideration should be given to delivering Biodiversity Net Gain.