QUESTION 78: Do you support

Object

Representation ID: 276

Received: 04/07/2021

Respondent: Mrs Alaina Ratcliffe

This site is not suitable due to existing drainage problems from previous builds, it would have a huge impact on mill lane and Florence way due to a lot more traffic, this area would suffer severely if more properties were build on this site.
The school would also struggle with extra families in the area.

Object

Representation ID: 655

Received: 27/07/2021

Respondent: Miss Sarah Hanlan

The area is small for 12 houses.
Already we have plumbing issues.
We have an oak tree with a tpo in the way of the path and road if it is to be widened.
You would block our view.
Why choose a tiny field when you have two large areas to use.
We have only just got this little close civilized and free from antisocial behaviour please don’t put 12 random families on it.

Comment

Representation ID: 660

Received: 23/07/2021

Respondent: Diana Wadley

SN03018: Florence Way, Ellingham. The way to the village, Mill Lane, has no footway. The junction with Mill Road is hazardous if on foot due to cars turning into Mill Lane not being able to see pedestrians, who have to leap onto the garden of the bungalow on the corner of Mill Close.

Support

Representation ID: 669

Received: 27/07/2021

Respondent: Mrs E Moore

Of all the preferred sites the one off Florence Way seems to have the least impact on the present village layout as would the two rejected sites SN0304 and SN0303SL. Can we also inform you that there is no longer a pre-school at the village hall and also the present school is running to capacity so any development is sure to make a significant impact on this.

Comment

Representation ID: 946

Received: 30/07/2021

Respondent: Kirby Cane Parish Council

councillors would support this site, with caveat that road access arrangements must be resolved, and this is not just the immediate access road but also the corner of Mill Lane and Mill Road, which is of great concern to residents. Reason for support is that there is an existing small development adjacent to this site, and it is more contiguous with the existing development of the village, although it is still outside the Settlement Limit. If site does go forward for development, councillors believe there should be a provision for affordable housing, including a requirement for access for local people.

Support

Representation ID: 977

Received: 30/07/2021

Respondent: Cornerstone Planning Ltd

The promoter of Preferred Site SN3018 - Florence Way, Ellingham continues to support its allocation. We confirm that the site is available and developable. There are no known drainage constraints (contrary to another representation made). Consultation with NCC Highways has established requisite on and off site work; the promoter confirms that survey work has been completed, and that all such work can be undertaken/secured.

Object

Representation ID: 1062

Received: 31/07/2021

Respondent: Mr William Ansell

SN3018 Florence Way Ellingham
Development here has been previously refused as the road is not to required standard. Mill Lane has no adequate footpaths and we believe that improvements would be difficult to implement because the green land outside each property is owned by the freeholders.
The junction at the end of Mill Lane/Mill Road is poorly sighted. It is common practice for vehicles to park around this junction making navigation difficult particularly for busses.
Junction of Mill Road/Old Yarmouth Road busses and larger vehicles drive over the footpath regularly due to on street parking.

Comment

Representation ID: 1954

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Water Management Alliance

See attachment for full response.
SN3018 – Florence Way, Ellingham
Outside the IDD boundary, within the Waveney, Lower Yare and Lothingland IDB watershed catchment.
Major development - If surface water discharges within the watershed catchment of the Board's IDD, we request that this discharge is facilitated in line with the Non-statutory technical standards for sustainable drainage systems (SuDS).

Comment

Representation ID: 2141

Received: 14/07/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - LLFA

SN3018
See attachment for full comments
Few or no constraints.
Standard information required at a planning stage. "
1.] At risk of surface water flooding?: No
* 3.33% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 3.33% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 1.0% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 1.0% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
* 0.1% AEP Event [Extent]: No flooding present
* 0.1% AEP Event [Depth]: No flooding present.
2.] Internal & external flooding?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~500.00m): Yes - External Flooding
3.] Watercourses [Online ordinary watercourses or mains rivers]?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
4.] Surface water sewer systems?:
* On-site: No
* Within proximity to site (~100.00m): No
5.] Source Protection Zone?: Source Protection Zone 3
6.] Internal Drainage Board?: No IDB referenced
7.] The site predominantly has superficial deposits of SAND AND GRAVEL. Comments on infiltration potential are dependent on a complete geotechnical investigation, including BRE365 Soakaway Testing. Where possible, surface water infiltration should be utilised."

Assessment: Green

Comment

Representation ID: 2259

Received: 28/09/2021

Respondent: Norfolk County Council - Senior Ecologist

Rating: Green no major ecological constraints identified from desk-top search. Surveys, and biodiversity enhancement in accordance with policy required.
Field used /formerly used for grazing horses. PROW to site (Ellingham FP2 and FP3). other than hedges, no priority habitats identified (see MAGIC). Site within green habitat zone for great crested newts, and in SSSI IRZ but residential development does not trigger consultation with Natural England. Applications for planning consent should be accompanied by a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal/Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) which, together with the mitigation hierarchy, should inform the design. Consideration should be given to delivering Biodiversity Net Gain.