Comment

Representation ID: 1789

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Mrs Rosalie Hill

My view is that shortlisted sites SN0318 and SN2103 should be allocated instead of site SN0319. These two sites would still meet the allocation for the parish of 25 dwellings, whilst being smaller developments. Having two sites in different parts of the village would result in the extra traffic using varying routes in and out of the village.
The shortlisted site of SN0318 for up to 10 dwellings is more in keeping with the size of previous developments and whilst it does not follow the existing linear pattern of development it would have far less impact on adjacent properties and the volume of traffic.
The shortlisted site SN2103 is in close proximity to the school and would allow easy pedestrian access to the school along paved roads.
I agree with the rejected sites.