Object

Representation ID: 771

Received: 28/07/2021

Respondent: Mr joel pailes

Demand not made out.
Inclusion for limited growth already exists, current permissions for 23 dwellings, the addition of further dwellings brings no benefits to the village at all.
Development should take place in more sustainable locations than Wicklewood
This site, in effect is back gardens of houses/Milestone Lane.
South norfolk is consistent in Wicklewood setting precedents/refusal of back garden development/especially outside the settlement boundary which this is.
These refusals/precedents are a matter of record.
It is not fair/proportionate on a small village/oversubscribed school/land new housing in Wicklewood because South norfolk is trying to meet demand/targets from elsewhere in the District.