South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

Support

Representation ID: 2327

Received: 14/02/2023

Respondent: FW Properties

FW Properties consider VC HAL1 to be a suitable and deliverable location for new homes within the village. Development in this location, which is close to an established community, represents sustainable development as defined within the National Planning Policy Framework. The site is immediately available and its development for 35 homes is considered to be viable and deliverable. The site is not subject to any constraints which would prevent its development for housing and FW Properties believe that the site specific requirements attached to this draft allocation can all be fulfilled. Therefore VC HAL1 should be taken forward for allocation.

Support

Representation ID: 2328

Received: 14/02/2023

Respondent: FW Properties

FW Properties consider VC BAP1 to be a suitable and deliverable location for new homes within the village. The regeneration of this brownfield site as a residential development would provide social and environmental benefits to the local community. The site is immediately available and FW Properties consider the development of 25 new homes to be viable and deliverable. The site is not subject to any delivery constraints which would prevent its development for housing and we believe that the site specific requirements attached to this draft allocation can all be fulfilled. Therefore, VC BAP1 should be taken forward for allocation.

Support

Representation ID: 2329

Received: 15/02/2023

Respondent: FW Properties

FW Properties consider VC BRO1 to be a suitable and deliverable location for new homes within the village. Development in this location, which is close to an established community, would represent sustainable development as defined within the National Planning Policy Framework. The site is immediately available and its development for 50 homes is considered to be viable and deliverable. The site is not subject to any constraints which would prevent its development for housing and the site specific requirements attached to this draft allocation can all be fulfilled. As a result, VC BRO1 should be taken forward for allocation.

Support

Representation ID: 2337

Received: 16/02/2023

Respondent: FW Properties

We consider VC ROC2 to be a suitable and deliverable location for new homes within the village. Development in this location, close to an established community, represents sustainable development as defined within the National Planning Policy Framework. FW Properties, who developed 23 houses in the village in 2020, consider the development of VC ROC2 for 25 new homes to be viable and deliverable. The site is not subject to any constraints which would prevent its development for housing and the specific requirements attached to this draft allocation can all be fulfilled. VC ROC2 should therefore be taken forward for allocation.

Support

Representation ID: 2484

Received: 27/02/2023

Respondent: FW Properties

FW Properties consider Site VC NEW1 to be a suitable and deliverable location for new homes within the village. Development in this location, which is close to an established community, represents sustainable development as defined within the National Planning Policy Framework. The site is immediately available and its development for 25 homes is considered to be viable and deliverable. The site is not subject to any constraints which would prevent its development for housing and we believe that the specific requirements attached to this draft allocation can all be fulfilled. Site VC NEW1 should therefore be taken forward for allocation.

Support

Representation ID: 2485

Received: 27/02/2023

Respondent: FW Properties

The completed Regulation 19 Promoter Engagement Form for VC NEW1 is attached.

Object

Representation ID: 2643

Received: 03/03/2023

Respondent: FW Properties

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

FW Properties have submitted the attached Site Assessment for Land off Chapel Street as we believe the VCHAP proposals for the village are unsound without the inclusion of this land. Not only have the Parish Council expressed delivery concerns to the draft VC BAR1 but also there have been comparatively few homes built in the village during the last 20 years. If the land off Chapel Street and VC BAR1 are both developed for housing there would be an uplift of 35 new homes (excluding the 10 houses removed from the current local plan) which can be accommodated within Barford.