South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

Search representations

Results for Rockland St Mary With Hellington Parish Council search

New search New search

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

29.18

Representation ID: 2991

Received: 08/03/2023

Respondent: Rockland St Mary With Hellington Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Concerns have been raised regarding the proposed vehicular access, the new access point and footpaths. Please see the attached documents.

Change suggested by respondent:

Ensure the access track conforms to Type 6 Highway requirements.
Liaise with Highways regarding visibility and signage required.

Full text:

Concerns have been raised regarding the proposed vehicular access, the new access point and footpaths. Please see the attached documents.

Attachments:

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

29.19

Representation ID: 2992

Received: 08/03/2023

Respondent: Rockland St Mary With Hellington Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Concerns have been raised regarding the extent of research undertaken to find out the ecological impacts in the event this site is approved for development.
There is a listed traditional Thatched house building on School Lane.

Change suggested by respondent:

Ensure extensive research is undertaken with due diligence.

Full text:

Concerns have been raised regarding the extent of research undertaken to find out the ecological impacts in the event this site is approved for development.
There is a listed traditional Thatched house building on School Lane.

Attachments:

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

29.20

Representation ID: 2993

Received: 08/03/2023

Respondent: Rockland St Mary With Hellington Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The drainage and sewage systems are already under considerable stress and do not have the capacity to serve another 25/50 dwellings.

Change suggested by respondent:

Liaise with Anglian Water to ensure the systems are able to serve the community effectively including the increase in proposed dwellings.

Full text:

The drainage and sewage systems are already under considerable stress and do not have the capacity to serve another 25/50 dwellings.

Attachments:

Object

South Norfolk Village Clusters Housing Allocations Plan (Reg. 19 Pre-submission Draft)

Policy VC ROC2: South of The Street

Representation ID: 2994

Received: 08/03/2023

Respondent: Rockland St Mary With Hellington Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

This site is felt unsuitable and unachievable for 25 dwellings. There will be a detrimental effect on traffic flow and road safety with the unsatisfactory proposed vehicular access. There are already safety concerns for residents and accidents have occurred.
The Street is a major thoroughfare with a regular local private bus service to Norwich city which adds to traffic flows at peak times. Traffic mitigation could be achieved by reducing number of housing units to 8-10 but highway access and new footpath requirements remain unachievable as they cross significant third party private property and road signage, telegraph poles.

Change suggested by respondent:

Rockland St Mary’s current location density average is 0.0, this would increase to an average of 0.3/0.4 just purely based on this proposed site.

Full text:

This site is felt unsuitable and unachievable for 25 dwellings. There will be a detrimental effect on traffic flow and road safety with the unsatisfactory proposed vehicular access. There are already safety concerns for residents and accidents have occurred.
The Street is a major thoroughfare with a regular local private bus service to Norwich city which adds to traffic flows at peak times. Traffic mitigation could be achieved by reducing number of housing units to 8-10 but highway access and new footpath requirements remain unachievable as they cross significant third party private property and road signage, telegraph poles.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.